Judge Tena Campbell – post-verdict motions denied
RONALD D. RUSSO, Plaintiff, vs. BALLARD MEDICAL PRODUCTS, and KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, Defendants.
Case No. 2:05-cv-59 TC
United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16291
March 7, 2007
This case went to trial in November 2006. The jury returned a verdict for Mr. Russo against Ballard, finding no liability for co-Defendant Kimberly-Clark Corporation. The jury awarded Mr. Russo $ 17 million for misappropriation of his trade secret, and $ 3 million for breach of a Confidential Disclosure Agreement.
Post-verdict, Mr. Russo requested prejudgment interest from the date of the verdict, exemplary damages, and attorneys’ fees. Ballard moved for judgment as a matter of law, remittitur of damages, and for a new trial.
“Mr. Russo is not entitled to prejudgment interest on the verdict because the award is not definitely calculable and is based on unjust enrichment.”
Exemplary damages were denied since “the court does not find a public objective would be served by awarding exemplary damages.”
Attorney fees were denied since “the court does not deem this matter extraordinary to justify awarding attorneys’ fees.”
The Court also denied Ballard’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, Motion for New Trial and Motion for Remittitur.